About Me

Name: AJH
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Attacking Your Enemies & Distorting The Truth Is 'Fun'

Gibbs knows the art of war 

Rush Limbaugh on his show today, in response to a caller who described Gibbs as the worst press secretary ever and that he never answers tough questions, responded, “He's perfect. He is a propagandist.”

AJH

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Like Carter Before Him

Obama's Radicalism Is Killing the Dow

Personally, like Carter before him, I think incompetence, arrogance and just plain stupidity are large factors as well.

AJH

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Anti-Obama

Jonathan Mann at CNN describes the man as “the second most interesting man in American politics” (“Anti-Obama retains radio power”).

He “isn't black, slim, stylish or well schooled. He's a Republican with no elected office but a powerful hold on his party and a place in the news once again.”

It's Rush Limbaugh, “a big-bellied man who bellows into the radios of millions of people.”

AJH

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Deceptive & Gimmicky

Charles Krauthammer's “Deception at Core of Obama Plans

AJH

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Newt’s Overlooked Speech

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Reporters Take a Cue from Panhandlers

Like the Rocky Mountain News before it, the Seattle Post-Intelligencer is on the verge of bye-bye.

The Hearst Corporation, the P-I's owner, plans to sell the newspaper if no buyer steps forward.”

I don't know how one sells something without a buyer, but some of the P-I staff are working on it.

AJH

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Just Like Bill

George Stephanopoulos, when challenged directly, contradicts news reports and his own bosses.


I think George has taken some hints from the Bill Clinton playbook, very carefully parsing his words. No conference calls with the White House? How about private one-on-one calls?

Now, I like Stephanopoulos and think he's done a respectable job (most of the time) while at ABC's This Week. But his bias and background are there influencing (and sometimes tainting) his efforts to be a true journalist.

AJH

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bush v. Obama

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Chicago-style

Ken Blackwell gets right down to it in “Obama Channels Nixon”. I am hoping to one-day make the Enemies List as well.

The president gives flowery, Kumbayah speeches about post-partisan politics, changing the way Washington works, and reaching out to Republicans. At the very same time, he’s tasking his bare-knuckled hit-men with secretly finding a private-sector person to falsely label as the leader of the Republican Party, and then use the stature of the White House as a platform to smear that person and the GOP.

This outrageous smear campaign is beneath the dignity of any president. It demeans the White House to orchestrate such a dishonest campaign. And sadly, President Obama has destroyed whatever chance he had of building bridges with the GOP. He has engaged in the worst form of Chicago-style politics. By acting like a cheap political hack, he makes it clear that Republicans have no choice but to vigorously oppose his hyper-partisan, ultra-liberal agenda.

AJH

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Plight of Hookers in America

Here's a funny (and sad) little piece from a guy named Adams at the University of North Carolina at Wilmington (“Feminists are People, Too”). Why (and how) have so many wackjobs overtaken our colleges?

AJH


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Kultursmog

Emmett Tyrrell, editor of The American Spectator, ends a recent article with the best summation of the never-ending Rush-White House saga. It's a bit long-winded and he loves using very big words. However, the last few paragraphs are terrific.

Conservatives become acceptable when they disparage conservatives.”

[T]he controversy demonstrates anew the validity of O'Sullivan's Law. [Named after John O'Sullivan, former aide to Margaret Thatcher and former editor of National Review.] According to O'Sullivan's Law, in American culture if one is not firmly conservative, one will fall prey to the liberals who dominate the culture, polluting it with their left-wing politics and creating what I call Kultursmog.

In the smog, various timid conservatives have allowed themselves to become instrumentalities of the Democrats' hoax.

Among these timid folk are Michael Steele and David Frum.

My favorite among the timid conservatives is this Kathleen Parker, a conservative columnist who apparently rose without a trace. Until this autumn, I never had heard of her, and to this day, about the only time one does hear of her is when she is puffing liberal gases into the Kultursmog. In the autumn, she was one of the conservatives sternly critical of Sen. John McCain for his choice of the pulchritudinous Sarah Palin as a running mate. Now she is equally stern in her criticism of the pulchritudinous Limbaugh.
 
Her presence in the mainstream media is another example of how the political culture works. Conservatives become acceptable when they disparage conservatives. Rush Limbaugh never has taken the coward's way out — and he is very amusing.
John McCain was a media darling for doing just that, until he came up against their new buddy Obama.

AJH
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Encouraging Negativity

Bailouts and so-called stimulus may actually encourage recessions (“U.S. rescue efforts may risk double-dip recession”). It certainly fosters failure and increases the number of people and businesses asking for handouts.

U.S. companies, consumers and communities may grow so addicted to government financial help that cutting them off could trigger another recession soon after the current one ends.

[T]here is increasing concern that when the flow of public money subsides -- beginning next year when much of that stimulus package is spent -- the economy still won't be strong enough to stand on its own.

"The stuttering attempts to repair the banking and lending mechanisms so far by the new administration suggests that by late 2010, the specter of a second dip into recession will be looming large," economist Sheryl King said.

The latest evidence came on Monday when insurer American International Group was awarded its third bailout. Each one has different terms.

AJH

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Rebellion Is Coming

Pat Buchanan has a good manifesto this week on how we need to rise up and take back our government (“Pitchfork Time”). The fight is just beginning.

He has some very detailed information on the budget numbers and how it affects the taxpayers.
Here are some snippets:

In his campaign and inaugural address, Barack Obama cast himself as a moderate man seeking common ground with conservatives.

Yet, his budget calls for the radical restructuring of the U.S. economy, a sweeping redistribution of power and wealth to government and Democratic constituencies. It is a declaration of war on the Right.

Barack has no mandate for this.

Republicans are under no obligation to render bipartisan support to this statist coup d'etat. For what is going down is a leftist power grab that is anathema to their principles and philosophy.

We are not "headed down the road to socialism." We are there.

Who is going to pay for all this?

The president says he is gearing up for a fight on his budget.

Good. Let's give him one.

AJH

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Attack Machine

Background on the latest attacks on Rush are filtering through the media. Politico reports:

Top Democrats believe they have struck political gold by depicting Rush Limbaugh as the new face of the Republican Party, a full-scale effort first hatched by some of the most familiar names in politics and now being guided in part from inside the White House.

The strategy took shape after Democratic strategists Stanley Greenberg and James Carville included Limbaugh’s name in an October poll and learned [he] was deeply unpopular with many Americans, especially younger voters.

Democrats realized they could roll out a new GOP bogeyman for the post-Bush era by turning to an old one in Limbaugh.

It’s great for us, great for him, great for the press,” Carville said of Limbaugh. “The only people he’s not good for are the actual Republicans in Congress."
 
It was “an idea that started out simply enough but quickly proved to be deeply resonant by a rapid succession of events, say Democrats inside and outside the West Wing.”

The seeds were planted in October after Democracy Corps, the Democratic polling company run by Carville and Greenberg, included Limbaugh’s name in a survey and found that many Americans just don’t like him.

Paul Begala, a close friend of Carville, Greenberg and White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, said they found Limbaugh’s overall ratings were even lower than the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Obama’s controversial former pastor, and William Ayers, the domestic terrorist and Chicago resident.
I don't think Carville and company realize what they are dealing with here. A sleeping, complacent giant is awakening. The concervative, limited government movement is stirring. They haven't been so united since 2004, when people realized John Kerry should never be president. Bush was an imperfect vessel, but there was no way in hell I was going to sit by and watch the likes of Kerry take over the government. I encourage more reckless spending and attacks.

AJH
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Saving the World, One Taxpayer at a Time

Apparently thinking that praise will help convince Americans and the politicians to spend boatloads of more money, Gordon Brown hailed America as the “indispensable nation” in his speech before Congress (“Gordon Brown appeals to US Congress for help to save the world”). He is only the fifth British Prime Minister to address a joint session.

He said the U.S. should help to protect the world’s poor, calling on America to join him in a global agreement to “solve” the financial crisis.

I come now to talk of new and different battles we must fight together, to speak of a global economy in crisis and a planet imperilled,” he said. “I believe that you . . . are . . . the nation with the vision to protect and preserve our planet Earth.”

Seeking to restore his battered reputation in Britain, Mr Brown, whose love of the US is well known, had travelled to Washington hoping to replicate the success enjoyed by his predecessor Tony Blair,” the Telegraph reported.

Thankfully, his appeal for spending more to alleviate the plight of the world’s poor, was less enthusiastically.

The Telegraph noted it was a “well-received speech” with “19 standing ovations, the same as Mr Blair when he addressed the same assembly six years ago after the invasion of Iraq.”

Brown, who did not make his usual claim that the economic crisis began in the U.S., heaped praise on American innovation. Climate change and a global stimulus were high on his agenda.

I say we should seize the moment, because never before have I seen a world so willing to come together,” he said. “Never before has that been more needed, and never before have the benefits of co-operation been so far reaching.”

Brown said it was time to revive the visionary spirit of leaders such as FDR.

He said “that you, the American people, at your core, were, as you remain, every bit as optimistic as your Roosevelts, your Reagans and your Obamas.”

There is a move afoot and a sort of scandal in the U.K. That Brown has not and appears totally unwilling to “accept blame” and apologize for the economic problems experienced under his leadership. Of course, little, if any, good it will do. I have no idea why it is such a big deal there.

AJH

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive